The proof sits in five systems
TSIA2 scores in one platform, industry certifications in a vendor portal, CTE course history in the SIS, enlistment on a counselor's spreadsheet. No one view says this student qualifies.
Built only for Texas school districts
Turn near-ready students
into finished outcomes.
CCMRI finds every student who is one step away from a CCMR indicator — and tracks that step to done, while there is still time to act.
One platform for the three things Texas actually scores you on: your legacy CCMR rate, your 2031 differential-weighted rate, and the Bonus Outcomes your students actually produce.
Start with your own district.
Every Texas district's CCMR Outcomes-Bonus history is public. Type yours and we'll show what it captured, what it left, and its projected 2031 trajectory.
Source: TEA CCMR Outcomes-Bonus finals, 2021–2024. No email required.
$250M+set aside by Texas every year for CCMR Outcomes Bonuses
5–20%of that ceiling a district typically captures
95%of every new bonus dollar stays with the district
The gap
The problem isn't the data. It's the last step.
Districts don't miss CCMR outcomes because nobody is trying. They miss them because no single system can say, in October, this student needs one retest — and then make sure someone does something about it.
The reporting looks backward
Most CCMR reporting tells you what you missed after graduation. By then the student who needed one TSI retest has walked the stage, and the indicator can't be recovered.
The rate is about to be re-scored
Many districts report 85–99% CCMR while sitting at 45–51% STAAR Meets. Starting with the Class of 2030, differential weighting re-prices every indicator — and that spread stops being invisible.
The platform
Three jobs, done end to end.
CCMRI isn't a dashboard suite. It scores the accountability, builds the K-12 pipeline that feeds it, and finishes the pathway that makes an outcome count.
Accountability & funding
Your legacy CCMR rate, your 2031 differential-weighted rate, and the Bonus Outcomes you actually produced — computed from the same student records, side by side, so the true readiness gap is visible before TEA prices it.
- All 11 legacy CCMR indicators
- 2031 differential weighting, per student and per campus
- Bonus-Outcome production and capture rate
The K-12 readiness pipeline
Readiness is decided long before senior year. CCMRI tracks the pipeline from elementary growth through the senior retest, turns it into managed caseloads, and makes the work visible — and competitive — for the teachers actually doing it.
- CCMR case management — a named caseload per teacher and counselor, triaged by proximity
- Proactive Closing the Gaps tracking (Domain 3)
- Gamification — the Fantasy Draft, leaderboards and progress tracking
- K-12 growth projection from elementary MAP forward
Pathways & credentials
The last mile is where outcomes are won or lost — the certification exam nobody scheduled, the ASVAB nobody prepped for, the developmental skill nobody named. CCMRI runs that mile with an audit trail.
- 65 CTE Programs of Study, participant → completer
- IBC vouchers, outcomes and PEIMS-ready records
- 102 TSIA2 Learning Locator Codes · 44 ASVAB codes
One workflow
Three scores. One next step.
Legacy CCMR, 2031 differential weighting and Bonus-Outcome production are usually three separate reporting exercises, run by three different people, at three different times of year. In CCMRI they are one student list — and every student carries the single next action that moves all three at once.
Same three students. Same three next steps. Flipping the toggle doesn't change the work —
it only changes which lens the district is judged through. Marcus is done under both. Elena looks “probable”
today and needs one exam either way. David reads as a failure today and is one retest from moving on both
scoreboards. That is why legacy CCMR, 2031 weighting and Bonus Outcomes have to live in one list: work the next
step, and all three move together.
How it works
Connect your data. Get a worklist.
Connect the sources you already have
Ed-Fi, OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Skyward, Frontline — or a CSV with guided column mapping. No warehouse project, no IT sprint.
Every student is scored three ways
Legacy CCMR, 2031 differential weighting, and Bonus-Outcome status — per student, rolled up by campus, cluster and Closing the Gaps sub-population.
Everyone gets the one list that matters
The counselor gets students one step out. The CTE director gets completers missing a certification. The teacher gets a named caseload. The board gets the accountability picture.
The fiscal consequence
Funding your students already qualified for.
Every completed indicator is also a Foundation School Program consequence. Under TEC §48.110, Texas pays a district $5,000 per economically disadvantaged graduate proven ready, $3,000 per non-economically-disadvantaged graduate, and $4,000 for a special education graduate. That is the district's money — CCMRI's job is to make sure it gets claimed.
Invoiced after the state pays
TEA settles outcomes bonuses roughly two years after production. Performance fees follow that money — never ahead of it. CCMRI never asks a district to pay before the state does.
Only positive deltas count
A down year owes nothing. No clawback, no penalty, and your existing baseline revenue is never billable.
Clean for your counsel
The performance share is written as a fixed rate card per additional qualifying outcome — the Texas outcomes-contracting structure, procured best-value under TEC §44.031.
On the obvious question: a vendor paid on outcomes shouldn't be the one deciding whether an outcome
happened — and CCMRI isn't. Indicators are determined by your assessment scores, certification records and
enrollment data; the payable outcome is settled by TEA. Flat-rate options with no performance share are published
too, if your district prefers no financial alignment at all.
Trust & procurement
Built to clear district security review.
Districts screen vendors on privacy paperwork before they ever look at the product. Here is our posture, stated plainly — including what is not done yet.
FERPA school-official exception
COPPA grade gate (no direct email under grade 9)
TEC Ch. 32 — no sale, no ad targeting
AES-256 at rest · TLS 1.3 in transit
Tenant isolation at the rules layer
No student data trains any AI model
Immutable export & mass-view audit trail
VPAT 2.5 published · WCAG 2.1 AA
SOC 2 — control-mapped, not yet certified
SDPC TX-NDPA — signed unmodified
K-12CVAT / HECVAT on request
BYO-Database option (PII never leaves the district)
We do not claim certifications we do not hold, and we do not display the retired Student Privacy Pledge. Every item above is evidenced in the Trust Center.
Questions
What districts ask first
What is CCMRI?
CCMRI is a K-12 College, Career and Military Readiness analytics platform built only for Texas school districts. It unifies student readiness data that normally sits in five separate systems, identifies students who are one step away from a CCMR indicator, and tracks that step to completion. It also models how your CCMR rate changes under the 2031 differential-weighting rules.
Why not just use the TEA CCMR Tracker?
You should keep using it — it's the official state record and CCMRI doesn't replace it. The TEA Tracker tells you what the state has already recorded. It doesn't tell a counselor in October which student is one exam away from an indicator, it doesn't project your rate under 2031 differential weighting, and it doesn't manage the day-to-day work of getting that student across the line. CCMRI is the working layer on top of the state record.
What is a CCMR Bonus Outcome?
State funding TEA pays a district for each annual graduate proven college, career or military ready. Under TEC §48.110 as amended by HB 2 (2025): $5,000 per economically disadvantaged graduate, $3,000 per non-economically-disadvantaged graduate, $4,000 for a special education graduate. Thresholds apply — 11% of eco-dis annual graduates and 24% of non-eco-dis — with no threshold for special education graduates.
How is a Bonus Outcome different from CCMR?
CCMR means a student met any one of the 11 TEA indicators — broad. A Bonus Outcome requires proven readiness on an assessment plus a completed pathway: an industry-based certification, military enlistment, or an associate degree. Meeting TSI alone makes a student CCMR but is not by itself a Bonus Outcome. That distinction is exactly why a district can report 85–99% CCMR and still capture a small share of the bonus funding available to it. See the full breakdown →
What is the 2031 CCMR accountability change?
Beginning with the Class of 2030, TEA moves CCMR from a single pass/fail credit to differential weighting, where indicators carry different point values based on how strongly they correlate with postsecondary success. Districts whose rate rests on low-weight indicators — College Prep courses, low-bar certifications, non-core dual credit — will see their reported rate fall. Districts with assessment-based readiness and strong CTE and certification programs are cushioned. How we model it →
Does CCMRI integrate with our SIS?
Yes — Ed-Fi, OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Skyward and Frontline, plus CSV upload with guided column mapping. Districts that can't send student data to a vendor cloud can run the Bring-Your-Own-Database option, where all student PII stays on district infrastructure and only pseudonymized metrics reach the cloud.
How does CCMRI handle student data privacy?
CCMRI operates as a school official with a legitimate educational interest under the FERPA school-official exception (34 CFR §99.31(a)(1)), codified in our Data Processing Agreement. Student data is processed only under district direction, never sold, never used for advertising, and never used to train AI models. Tenant isolation is enforced at the database rules layer rather than in application code, encryption is AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit, and every export and mass view lands in a tamper-resistant audit trail. Full posture →
If CCMRI is paid on outcomes, can it be trusted near the outcome data?
A fair question, and one your purchasing director should ask. CCMRI never determines whether a student met an indicator — that comes from your assessment scores, certification records and enrollment data, and the payable outcome is settled by TEA, not by us. Every write to a student record is attributed to a named district user in an immutable audit trail you can read directly. And if you'd rather have no financial alignment at all, the published flat-rate options carry no performance share. Compare the four options →
Do you have district customers yet?
We're onboarding our founding cohort now, and we don't publish logos or testimonials we haven't earned. What we offer instead is checkable: our calculation methodology is published so you can verify it against your own public TAPR and PEIMS figures, the platform is load-tested at 97,000 students with measured results, and the full security and privacy packet is available for district review before any commitment.
Free 2031 estimate — Texas districts
See your 2031 drop before TEA does.
Free, and no obligation. We'll build you two things from your district's own published TAPR data: a 2031 differential-weighting estimate showing where your CCMR rate lands under the new rules, and a working demo loaded with your district's real numbers — not a generic sandbox. Twenty minutes, no slideware, whether or not you ever become a customer.